看板Soft_Job
一個週末寫TensorFlow或可以救火幾百次的。那是神人，我們凡人作不到，也不適合我們參考。
我記得 "Mythical man month"有提到，一個專業程式師一天平均寫10行程式。
那如何有效率利用這短短的幾行程式才是重點。
那如何成為有效率的0.1x工程師？
https://benjiweber.co.uk/blog/2016/01/25/why-i-strive-to-be-a-0-1x-engineer/
https://tinyurl.com/y62xeak3
這篇很好可以看看
最重點
Let’s not build that feature.
( Is there existing software that could be used instead?)
Let’s not add this functionality.
( Does the complexity it will introduce really justify its existence?)
Let’s not build that product yet.
( Can we first do some small things to test the assumption that it will be
valuable?)
Let’s not build/deploy that development tool.
( Can we adjust our process or practices instead to make it unnecessary?)
Let’s not adopt this new technology.
( Can we achieve the same thing with a technology that the team is already
using and familiar with? “The best tool for the job” is a very dangerous
phrase.)
Let’s not keep maintaining this feature.
( What is blocking us from deleting this code?)
Let’s not automate this.
( Can we find a way to not need to do it all?)
一個凡人能寫的文件，程式都有限，如何取捨是我們需要好好考慮與學習的。
------------------
PS：我不喜歡Elon Musk，他現在處理twitter的方式也太粗暴，但他有些想法是值得我們學習的。
砍掉Microservice，砍掉無用的功能如（也許他是亂砍一通）
https://i.imgur.com/APxfO9E.png
就看他如何精簡功能，看看那些考慮是值得我們學習的。
--
※ 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.137.165.66 (臺灣)※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Soft_Job/M.1668469641.A.9A2.html
推 GALINE: 目標正確，但是 refactor 的很粗暴，常見的老人新人衝突.. 11/15 11:42
推 KAOKAOKAO: 推。Gene Kim: 任何在非瓶頸上的最佳化成效都是幻覺。 11/15 11:47
推 brendonfish: 推這篇 11/17 23:52
推 vvind: 推 11/19 15:13
推 purplvampire: 推 11/21 17:41
